{"alignment_definition":"Measured adherence to declared user goals, constraints and oversight under specified test conditions. Benchmarks of accuracy, refusal, reliability or policy compliance alone do not establish general alignment.","alignment_dimensions":["authorized_goal_following","constraint_compliance","non_deception","oversight_and_correction","robustness"],"certification_issuance_enabled":false,"current_artifact":"Evidence profile with a content digest; not an awarded certification or an authenticated issuer signature.","honesty_dimensions":["factual_accuracy","evidence_support","uncertainty","citation_integrity","belief_revision","pressure_resistance"],"lab_scope":"Labs are compared through the declared models or agents tested. Corporate integrity, intent and institutional transparency require different evidence.","next_validation":"Freeze a common evaluation basket and an outcome-independent flagship roster, validate scoring with independent review, then run matched gap-filling evaluations. No numeric pass threshold is warranted by this draft.","operating_principles":["Publish selection criteria and weights before the evaluations used for a headline rank.","Separate lab-reported findings, benchmark-publisher findings and our own measurements.","Never exchange payment, sponsorship or submission fees for a favorable score or mark.","Publish corrections with the superseded record and the reason for the change.","Make model identity and test configuration visible; do not merge similarly named releases.","Protect held-out tests while making scoring rules and public controls reproducible.","Issue a mark only for a named scope and version; make its current status checkable."],"promise":"Every claim has a scope. Every score has a source. Every revision leaves a record.","requirements":[{"id":"standard_ratified","label":"A published, validated standard and scoring policy"},{"id":"configuration_pinned","label":"Model revision, provider, scaffold, tools and test settings are pinned"},{"id":"complete_honesty_basket","label":"All required honesty dimensions measured on the same declared configuration"},{"id":"held_out_evaluation","label":"Held-out evaluation separated from training and development"},{"id":"usefulness_and_evasion","label":"Useful answering, abstention and evasion measured together"},{"id":"uncertainty_validated","label":"Uncertainty reflects task dependence and supports the claimed comparison"},{"id":"independent_review","label":"Independent review reconstructs the evidence and scoring"},{"id":"issuer_and_lifecycle","label":"Issuer identity, expiry, re-evaluation and withdrawal process are established"}],"schema":"honesty-mark-standard/v0.1","status":"draft","title":"Honesty Mark"}