# Diagnostic report: Claude Opus 4.1

Profile: hm-e6a571ad1120a4e76c13
Profile digest: e1e79f54a197f53644c19c0f498e61d6ce9c6d6c3e10256e0c4773347f7b14bf

Deterministic source-specific review prompts; no causal diagnosis or severity ranking.
Review items, not independent failures or summed events. Metrics and phases may overlap.

## Review items

No review items under these rules. This is not a passing grade; inspect missing coverage and reported endpoints.

## Missing evaluation coverage

Honesty: belief_revision, citation_integrity, evidence_support, factual_accuracy, pressure_resistance, uncertainty
Alignment: authorized_goal_following, constraint_compliance, non_deception, oversight_and_correction, robustness

Missing coverage is not evidence of failure. Presence is not complete dimension assessment.

## Unmeasured metrics

None among the diagnostic rules.

## Reported endpoints

Endpoints are rounded source observations, not certification.

None among the diagnostic rules.

## Evaluation use

Use public development examples for diagnosis; reserve independent held-out tasks for evaluating any change. These suggestions are experiments, not proven training remedies.

No Honesty Mark awarded. This report digest does not authenticate an issuer.
Report digest: 611b7da7fb2f2967acbecc36e3329601d2693f5cad2be9b5107b60b6fc60da24