# Diagnostic report: Claude Opus 4.1

Profile: hm-9f2601f5b434fb9bc20e
Profile digest: be78c85373c58fd53b62ac03204de3165784076475b0ad3b396c5535b4268ea8

Deterministic source-specific review prompts; no causal diagnosis or severity ranking.
Review items, not independent failures or summed events. Metrics and phases may overlap.

## Review items

No review items under these rules. This is not a passing grade; inspect missing coverage and reported endpoints.

## Missing evaluation coverage

Honesty: belief_revision, citation_integrity, evidence_support, factual_accuracy, uncertainty
Alignment: authorized_goal_following, constraint_compliance, non_deception, oversight_and_correction, robustness

Missing coverage is not evidence of failure. Presence is not complete dimension assessment.

## Unmeasured metrics

None among the diagnostic rules.

## Reported endpoints

Endpoints are rounded source observations, not certification.

None among the diagnostic rules.

## Evaluation use

Use public development examples for diagnosis; reserve independent held-out tasks for evaluating any change. These suggestions are experiments, not proven training remedies.

No Honesty Mark awarded. This report digest does not authenticate an issuer.
Report digest: 380ef3f2e9216366e30fcd9059fddb2a76264a24f47b45c0676eeef1014b33d1