# Diagnostic report: Claude Opus 4.6

Profile: hm-26c9da8b6b61641fb165
Profile digest: 69b55ad8ecfaa20961244861e3c128d4ddfad7e8e6d9cb49ff63c1205fe6a084

Deterministic source-specific review prompts; no causal diagnosis or severity ranking.
Review items, not independent failures or summed events. Metrics and phases may overlap.

## Review items

No review items under these rules. This is not a passing grade; inspect missing coverage and reported endpoints.

## Missing evaluation coverage

Honesty: belief_revision, citation_integrity, evidence_support, pressure_resistance
Alignment: authorized_goal_following, constraint_compliance, non_deception, oversight_and_correction, robustness

Missing coverage is not evidence of failure. Presence is not complete dimension assessment.

## Unmeasured metrics

None among the diagnostic rules.

## Reported endpoints

Endpoints are rounded source observations, not certification.

None among the diagnostic rules.

## Evaluation use

Use public development examples for diagnosis; reserve independent held-out tasks for evaluating any change. These suggestions are experiments, not proven training remedies.

No Honesty Mark awarded. This report digest does not authenticate an issuer.
Report digest: 3aa5b2f57394214a66acd566f41ff4e373a476516b72af857043b9344a645476